THE ADVANCE OF REASON

David Selzer By David Selzer1 Comment2 min read1.7K views

Francis Bacon – not the figurative Irish

painter, the almost incomparable

depictor of human unreason –

but the Elizabethan/Jacobean

English essayist, diplomat, lawyer,

philosopher and politician, who was,

according to Euro-centric legend,

not only the real author of Shakespeare’s

plays but also the last person to have read

every book that had ever been written –

went to Trinity College, Cambridge,

when he was 12, and left at 16

to join the diplomatic service.

While at Cambridge he concluded that,

though admirable in itself, Aristotle’s

approach was not fit for purpose since

it did not improve ‘the estate of man’.

 

Later he would write THE ADVANCEMENT

OF LEARNING, whose taxonomies would inform

The Enlightenment, and NOVUM ORGANUM,

in Latin, whose empiricism

would establish the scientific method.

 

In a parallel life he was an MP

in a number of constituencies,

took gifts from litigants while Lord Chancellor,

and campaigned tirelessly for the urgent

beheading of Mary Queen of Scots.

 

***

 

The title NOVUM ORGANUM alludes

to Aristotle’s ORGANUM, his work

on logic the youthful Bacon decried.

The engraved title page of Bacon’s book

shows a galleon in full sail surging

through the Pillars of Hercules – now the Straits

of Gibraltar – west of which, according to

Plato, Atlantis lay. The pillars

were inscribed with a sailors’ warning:

Non Plus Ultra – Nothing Further Beyond.

 

Meanwhile, however, in far Cathay,

medical practitioners still consult

regularly a book of herbal medicines

and their uses which was written in the late

Han dynasty more than a thousand years

before Francis Bacon put quill to parchment.

 

 

 

 

ACROSS THE VELDT

David Selzer By David Selzer3 Comments1 min read2.1K views

For Sizwe Vilakazi

 

Fearing electricity – only installed

in rural Kwazulu post-Apartheid –

would disturb and thus devalue their cattle

the village elders decided it should come

no closer than the main road to Bergville,

a mile or so from their scattered houses.

 

Though the night sky, with its myriads

and myriads of stars, stayed above

the ancestors’ houses unpolluted,

in time there were fewer cattle, fewer folk.

Young people still left for the townships.

 

***

 

On our last morning, the family’s

little girl and her younger brother took us

across the veldt to their uncle’s kraal

to see newly born twin calves. The children,

on the dirt path through high dry grasses,

moved like silence, but we, clumsy townies,

raised a flock of plovers. The spindly calves

were suckling, and watched us with startled,

curious eyes, their mother impassive.

 

***

 

As we drove north on the Bergville road

to join the N3 we passed a primary school

with a Coca Cola sponsored sign,

and slowly over the Drakensberg mountains

winter’s first clouds appeared.

 

 

 

 

A CHANCE FOR KINDNESS

When I was a student I seemed rather prone

to being accosted by panhandlers –

which conflicted me. Was I being kind,

or conned? I remember one incident

particularly – at Liverpool’s Pier Head –

that was an impromptu lesson about

the British Empire’s maritime past.

I had disembarked from the Woodside Ferry

and was crossing the cobbles to the bus

for the Student’s Union on Brownlow Hill

to join some friends for an evening of Guinness

when a man, old enough to be my father,

stopped me politely. He was wearing a tie,

but ill-matched jacket and trousers. He explained

that he was a Lascar from Chennai;

showed me his Merchant Navy passbook

with lists of ships he had sailed on, and ports

he had travelled to; showed me the long, deep scar

livid on his right leg, that had stranded him

at the city’s Merchant Seamen’s Mission;

and that I had a very, very kind face.

I cannot remember how much I gave him.

It took me many years to realise

that to be kind is to be privileged.

 

 

 

 

 

FOUND IN TRANSLATION: INTRODUCTION – DAVID SELZER

David Selzer By David Selzer2 Comments4 min read2.5K views

Whatever may be lost in translation is, I would suggest, always far outweighed by what may be found.  A good translation is one that transports the spirit of the original, even if the odd letter is left on the journey. Translations open up entire cultures and histories, and confirm both our diversity and our common humanity.

 

This new section of the website is to celebrate and, if needed, promote poetry, prose fiction, drama, and non-fiction, famous or obscure, translated into English. The celebrations maybe scholarly, journalistic, personal – or a combination of all three.

 

**************************************************************************

 

In 1959, when I was 15, I read the Max Hayward and Matya Harari English translation of Boris Pasternak’s DR ZHIVAGO. I think that was the first foreign language book I had read. I still have the same copy, and – often inspired by watching/re-watching David Lean’s DR ZHIVAGO – have re-read the novel and the poems that accompany it a number of times since.

 

Here is a useful account of the novel itself, and the furore and fame that accompanied its publication firstly in an Italian translation in 1957 and then, in the English version referred to, in 1958: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_Zhivago_(novel). DR ZHIVAGO was so popular that the English publisher, Collins, ordered six re-prints from September 1958 to November 1958.

 

I was fortunate to be brought up in a household where reading and owning books was seen as integral to family life – and affordable. If I remember correctly DR ZHIVAGO was bought – by my mother or one of her sisters – as a result of the publicity stemming from the geo-politic controversy surrounding it.

 

The action of the novel takes place between the early 1900s and circa 1950. I was interested in reading it for two reasons. I thought that the Russian Revolution of 1917 was not only an inevitable event but one that represented the triumph of equality, freedom and comradeship – and, yes, I was also inspired by the French Revolution! – over injustice, tyranny and hostility. My paternal grandfather was what we would now describe as a refugee, an asylum seeker from what was then Kiev in Tzarist Russia. (See ASYLUM SEEKER). In 1900 – the year he escaped – the Russian empire included not only Ukraine but also Poland, the Baltic States and Finland.

 

I did not learn anything about my Grandpa’s Russia – except that Russian cavalry did indeed ride people down in the street – and I found the very convincing descriptions of the unintended consequences of the Revolution both disappointing and disheartening. Nevertheless there was something in the book that not only made me want to finish it but, as I have mentioned, have made me need re-read it at least three times.

 

So what brings me back to the book? The love stories? The depiction of historical events? The sense of the vastness of Russia? Its religiosity? The evocation of place and nature? The notion that our lives to a greater or lesser extent are determined by the vicissitudes of chance? And sometimes by the machinations – accidental or intentional – of others? Perhaps simply because it is a tale of heartache and hope?

 

Boris Pasternak was well known to Russian readers both as a translator – of Shakespeare, for example – and as a poet. (So renowned was he that Stalin personally phoned him in 1934 to talk about the poet Osip Mandelstam – https://qcurtius.com/2017/11/18/a-phone-call-with-stalin/ ). DR ZHIVAGO is assumed to be semi-autobiographical. Zhivago is both a physician and a poet. His poems appear in the book after the Epilogue, poems informed by and informing his life. Here is the first of them:

 

HAMLET

The noise is stilled. I come out on the stage.

Leaning against the door-post

I try to guess from the distant echo

What will happen in my lifetime.

The darkness of the night is aimed at me

Along the sights of a thousand opera glasses.

Aba, Father, if it be possible,

Let this cup pass from me.

I love your stubborn purpose,

I consent to play my part.

But now a different drama is being acted;

For this once, let me be.

Yet the order of the acts is planned

And the end of the way inescapable.

I am alone; all drowns in the Pharisee’s hypocrisy.

Life is no stroll through a field.

 

The last line is a Russian proverb. Perhaps when I re-read the book once more I shall start this time with the poems.

 

**************************************************************************

 

I would very much like readers to contact me about works translated into English which have particular significance for them and which they would like featured on the site. The significance may be personal, cultural and/or historical. The translations can be the reader’s own, of course. Other readers’ views on DR ZHIVAGO would be welcome too. In addition, I shall be commissioning posts about particular works and/or writers.

The commissioned posts published to date are:

Ian Craine – https://davidselzer.com/2025/10/found-in-translation-translators-and-translations-of-our-days-ian-craine/

Clive Watkins – https://davidselzer.com/2026/03/found-in-translation-five-poems-by-eugenio-montale-clive-watkins/

Farzan Radfar & Hassan Shabani –  https://davidselzer.com/2026/09/found-in-translation-hafez-of-shiraz-hassan-shabani-farzan-radfar/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LE CAFÉ-BAR DE PÈRE LACHAISE

David Selzer By David Selzer3 Comments2 min read2.1K views

The cobbled street is slick with the morning’s rain.

My Solex moped slips slightly as I brake

in front of the café-bar. I dismount,

and hurry in. The place is full of smoke –

Gitanes and Gauloise, the odd cigarillo,

pipes – and lookalikes – Simone Signoret,

for example, over there, with Jean Gabin.

The radio is playing ‘Sous les toits

de Paris’. Maurice Chevalier sings,

‘Nous sommes seules ici-bas.’ I remove

my wet cape, and shudder, remembering

walking the paths of the cemetery

in the rain at dawn, searching for hours

in Père Lachaise for a grave I could not find.

 

I notice there is only one seat free –

in the furthest corner next to a man

with a pipe who might be Jean-Paul Sartre

perhaps or even Georges Simenon.

I hang my cape on the pegs near the bar,

order a Ricard, and make my way

to the corner. Sartre-Simenon looks up,

takes his pipe from his mouth and points, with its stem,

to the empty chair. “Merci, monsieur,” I say.

I sit. On the radio Yves Montand

is singing ‘Les Feuilles Mortes’. The double-double,

pointing to the sandy mud on my shoes,

asks if I found the grave I was looking for.

In response to my surprise, ‘Voilà’, he says,

pointing to his own shoes, and the floor tiles

bestrewn with the same detritus, and then

at the other lookalikes in the café-bar.

‘Nous en avons tous marre,’ he says. Each one

is silent, introspective, as Montand sings,

‘Et la mer efface sur le sable.’

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE WOMAN IN THE WHEELCHAIR

David Selzer By David Selzer3 Comments4 min read2.2K views

He had gone to the island to die – or to

disappear. He would decide as the minutes,

the hours, days, weeks unfolded like a map.

He had chosen the month of August

assuming that, because of the tropical

heat, there would be fewer visitors then.

He had chosen to go to that island

in particular because it was where

his ancestors had been taken in chains.

 

Although the noisy air conditioning

in his room was on full power the air smelt

of damp and of plants. He switched the machine off,

opened the balcony doors, and stepped out

into the sunlight, and the heat. Before him,

perhaps no more than fifty feet away,

was what appeared to be pristine jungle.

He could smell the exotic vegetation.

To his left he could see the silvery beach,

and the Caribbean a shining turquoise –

to his right, on the next balcony,

a woman in a wheelchair. Though her face

was mostly obscured by an elegant hat,

he noticed her skin was the colour

of amber – and that, despite the heat,

she was wearing long white cotton gloves.

She seemed to be asleep. He withdrew quickly.

Naively he had not thought about neighbours.

 

The hotel was full of guests. On that island

in the month of August hotels catered

for conferences. The one next to his –

vast, modern, and gleaming with reflective glass –

was hosting Gospel Churches of the Delta.

Though some delegates were accommodated

in his hotel, sleeping and eating there,

morning, afternoon and most of the evening

the place was empty but for members of staff,

himself, and the woman in the wheelchair.

He had hoped therefore to find somewhere tranquil

to think through in detail the whys and wherefores,

the ways and means of his disappearance

or death, but the woman moved her wheelchair –

through dull corridors, across shabby lounges,

on worn pathways between the coconut palms –

like a Para-Olympic athlete,

with speed and precision, being able to stop

and turn on a dime. He understood the gloves

now, giving her extra thrust. She seemed

to wear a different colour every day: blue

yesterday, today red, white tomorrow?

Was she a patriot, or a joker,

in her own private circle of hell?

 

He studied the conference delegates

at breakfast. They did not seem particularly

blessed or enraptured – then suddenly realised

that it had been his obsession with

the minutiae of other people’s souls,

their internal lives, that had brought him here,

and that he was becoming obsessed with his

new neighbour, as he had started to think

of the woman in the wheelchair.

It was not the accumulation per se

of all the years of pettiness, pathos,

horror he had heard in the confessional

which had undone him, but the fact that if he,

only feet away from these suffering souls,

could do nothing to help except regurgitate

platitudes in that mega city, what chance

had an abstraction somewhere beyond.

 

In the early hours of the fourth morning

before the air conditioning was needed

to prevent his room becoming too warm,

using the hotel stationery he began

a mind map – in his precise almost

miniature calligraphy – of the ways

he might disappear or die, and realised

he could only effectively do

the former if he first did the latter.

Unsure how he felt about his choices

reduced by half, he showered, went to breakfast

taking the carefully folded map with him.

 

He decided that if he walked quickly

behind the woman in the wheelchair

she would always be more or less out of sight.

She must have changed direction at some point

because they met on one of the pathways

through the palms. ‘Coming through’, she called out

charmingly, and, smiling, ‘Thank you so much’,

as she passed him. He stood to one side,

like a retainer, unable to speak.

He noticed she was wearing the white gloves.

 

Eventually he found somewhere quiet

to contemplate his destiny. The hotel

was on the south east coast of the island

so faced the sun for much of day.

In the late afternoon, looking for shade,

he walked along the beach towards where the sand

and the jungle met. He found an ancient

baobab tree, took shelter in a vast cleft

in its trunk, and unfolded the mind map.

As he studied it, he remembered reading

that baobabs could live for a thousand,

two thousand years, that they had grown here

from seeds drifting across the Atlantic,

following the currents from West Africa,

on the base line of that triangular trade –

and realised his map took no account

of accidents, coincidents, irony.

He decided to bury it. As he dug

he looked up suddenly. A sting ray,

perhaps twenty feet across, had risen

from the sea barely fifty yards away,

on its giant wings of pectoral cartilage.

As it dived another rose, and another.

He got to his feet. He had to tell someone.

He would tell the woman in the wheelchair.