POETRY

THE BRIDGE AT HOUGH

David Selzer By David Selzer4 Comments1 min read2.5K views

And this poem, which will be about England,

and, in some part, the southern margins

of the North, and the vagaries of the tongue,

has already stalled at the title’s fourth word.

Does it rhyme with ‘though’ or ‘tough?  Or with ‘cow’

or ‘row’? That is ‘row’ as in beans, of course,

not as in a shouty altercation.

It is as in ‘huff’, ‘houfe’, ‘hoff’ – from the Old English

for the heel of a hill, a projecting ridge.

 

As you drive through the ancient hamlet,

you do not notice any raised ground or,

indeed, the place – scattered by the road

to the Potteries – but for the signs on leaving

and entering. At one end of the hamlet –

that on the eastern edge of Cheshire –

is the bridge itself: narrow, stone, hump-backed,

replaced and repaired since medieval times.

Beneath the bridge – famed now in the annals

of English verse! – runs Swill Brook, and along

its reedy banks are endangered colonies

of water voles: aka water rats,

rats taupier, arvicola

amphibius. The brook springs limpid

from the clayey earth some miles south, seeps

northwards into the River Weaver’s catchment,

and so into the Mersey, past Liverpool,

through St George’s Channel to the Atlantic.

England’s mercantile empire shoved its

Anglo-Saxon tongue – complete with French veneer

and Greco-Roman embellishments –

down the throats of millions.

 

 

A VICIOUS FARCE

David Selzer By David Selzer8 Comments1 min read2.5K views

I did not celebrate the crowning of King Charles,

nor did I help out at ‘The Big Help Out’ –

a public holiday designated

by the seventy four year old

billionaire as an opportunity

for his subjects to work for nothing,

undertaking public service jobs

someone used to be employed to do.

For only two times in my life was I

in step. Most of the residents of this realm

neither celebrated nor helped out –

from opposition or from boredom.

 

Apathy and obedience are

the opiates that have been chosen

for the people – by those masquerading

as democrats,  by those who wish

to patronise, silence, manipulate us,

whatever coloured flag they sail under:

autocrats, cowards, plutocrats, traitors.

 

What a useful distraction and screen it was,

that lavish, weird pantomime of feudal mummery,

part Wizard of Oz, part Police State,

that convention of sycophants and drones,

that colloquium of tokenism,

that convocation of cliché and drivel,

that vicious Whitehall farce.

 

 

THE USUAL SUSPECTS

David Selzer By David Selzer0 Comments1 min read1.5K views

When I was younger corrupt public servants

were always some sort of foreign Johnny –

like the chief of police in ‘Casablanca’ –

and events like Covid-19 the result

of utterly unique and totally

unforeseen circumstances not neglect,

incompetence or insouciance,

much less deliberate mayhem.

 

Now the malfeasance is in plain sight.

The crooks in all but name – public school boys

and their acolytes of all classes

and genders, the useful idiots,

the ready sycophants, the gong-chasers,

the jacks-in-office, and their main stream

media apologists and enablers –

are the same entitled class that purloined

the so-called Elgin Marbles, and had away

with the Benin Bronzes, and murdered

Iraqi Kurds and Kenyan Kikuyu.

 

Now that, for the masters and the mistresses

of the universe, self-righteousness

is justification enough for greed

and thievery, and self-interest

and the public good are one – unless

you are in receipt of so-called benefits

obviously. So those who, consequently,

die or are maimed are always undeserving

and dispensable. Thus, by default,

Aristotle’s Great Chain of Being

appears not only intact but well-oiled,

the concept of choice of the Establishment –

that exclusive sui generis elite.

 

 

 

A PIECEMEAL CRISIS

We were nearly two months into spring, only

moments away from summer, and yet, yet,

though three swifts had returned from Africa,

though a pair of ungainly wood pigeons

courted in a neighbour’s gutter, though there were

hot days perfumed with plants and bee laden,

wintry winds from the north harried clouds south,

and the sparrows were hesitant to lay,

the laburnum reluctant to unfurl

its golden curlicues. The Four Horsemen

are coming, not at a canter but

crabwise in dressage. Armageddon

is approaching, not with a bang and a flash

but little by little.

 

Note: This piece has also been published in EXTERMINATING ANGEL PRESS THE MAGAZINE.

THE SHIP OF THESEUS AND THE HOUSE OF WINDSOR

David Selzer By David Selzer5 Comments2 min read3.1K views

Theseus, with the help of Ariadne,

daughter of Minos, King of Crete, slew

the Minotaur – that creature with a bull’s head

and a man’s body – in the labyrinth

which imprisoned him. They rescued the fourteen

noble youths and maidens of Athens,

sacrificial tribute, who had been food

for the Minotaur. With the princess

and the young people, Theseus escaped

from Crete and sailed his trireme to Athens.

(En route he left Ariadne on Naxos,

for reasons which need not detain us here).

 

The Athenians, in gratitude for saving

the scions of their nobility, revered

the ship in which they had returned, maintained it

for many centuries – replacing

rotten timber, frayed rope, and torn canvas.

Inevitably, this being Ancient Greece,

a problem arose, and persists even now,

of a philosophical nature:

at what point, if any, does the Ship of

Theseus cease to be Theseus’ ship?

 

Thomas Hobbes – sometime mathematics tutor

to Charles, Prince of Wales, later Charles II –

and most famous for opining, during

the havoc of the English Civil War,

that life in anything other than

a comprehensive autocracy

would be ‘solitary, poor, nasty, brutish

and short’ – posed an interesting what if

regarding The Ship of Theseus.

 

Imagine that, instead of recycling

the redundant parts for, say, fuel,

they had been made the responsibility

of a custodian, who rebuilt the ship

following the original blueprint,

so that, in time, there would have been two vessels,

both from the original design,

one from the original materials –

and the latter, Hobbes concluded, might still

properly be identified as

The Ship of Theseus. Some, however,

may think the issue of identity

irrelevant, one ship being seaworthy,

the other a tad dystopian –

which brings me neatly to the House of Windsor

aka Saxe-Coburg und Gotha, aka

Hanover, Stuart, Tudor etcetera.

 

Proper names belong, are unique, confer,

confirm, create identity: Ariadne

of Naxos, the Minotaur of Knossos –

who, by the way, were siblings, but that tale

is for another day. So, to Charles III,

tax dodger, and ersatz Renaissance man:

who seems unlike his gaudy namesakes –

the father, who spectacularly lost his head;

the son, something of a stage door Johnny –

except both his predecessors also believed

they had been anointed by God himself,

and were similarly obsessed with worldly wealth.

He can trace his line to Alfred the Great,

King of the Anglo-Saxons, and Kenneth

MacAlpin, King of the Picts. All of which is

as insubstantial and insignificant

as an imagined splinter from the deck

of some mythical ship.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ON THE RWANDA PLAN

David Selzer By David Selzer3 Comments2 min read2.3K views

One of the things that demonstrates how we are

a cut above lesser animals, even

our closest, primate cousins – in addition,

of course, to double entry bookkeeping –

is our ability to plan and manage

projects: like fox hunting and the Pyramids.

 

However, we should never forget

‘of mice and men’, ‘betwixt cup and lip’,

and ‘unintended consequences’ – like

throngs of tourists and urban foxes.

And take, for example, some of the proffered

solutions by European Powers

to the so-called ‘Jewish question’: Britain’s

Balfour Declaration, and the two

Madagascar Plans in the ’30s – the first

was Franco-Polish, the second German.

 

The first plan involved the voluntary

re-settlement of thousands of Polish Jews

in the island of Madagascar,

then a French colony; the second,

following the fall of France, the enforced

migration of all European Jews

to act as hostages to ensure their

‘racial comrades in America’ behaved.

Both proved unfeasible – the former

because of climate and poor infrastructure,

and the latter because, having lost

the Battle of Britain, the Nazis

abandoned the invasion of the UK.

The requisitioned British Merchant Fleet

was to have shipped the Jews to the island.

 

As the forces of the Third Reich conquered

Eastern Europe and entered Russia

a new plan developed: to move the Jews

and the Slavs to Siberia, to starve

or be murdered. When the Soviets refused

to be defeated the Final Solution

to that inadmissible question –

Die Endlösung der Judenfrage

was devised: the building of gas chambers

at Auschwitz, Belzec, Chelmno, Majdanek,

Sobibor, Treblinka.