TEARS ARE CHEAP

One of His Majesty’s Ministers breaks down

in tears uncontrollably in a makeshift

tent in the scrublands of Chad near the border

with Darfur. Millions of women and children –

the men dead or in hiding – are on the move

again in their multi-coloured robes,

hoping again to escape hunger

and molestation, the greed and havoc of

post-imperial wars. There to promote

the good deeds of HMG, the Minister –

without the protection of suit and tie,

and the gentlemen’s club procedures

of the House of Commons, without the bombast

of office, the fustian oratory

of the pretence of power – is reduced

to a human being.

 

 

What do you think?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 Comments
  • David Press
    January 3, 2025

    I like this powerful poem with its strong contrasting images of the hunger and havoc in the scrublands, the multicoloured robes and the conventions of clothes and customs of the commons. But I wonder whether ‘returned to a human being’ would be more apposite than ‘reduced’? I also struggled with the title: in this context, aren’t tears human rather than cheap?

    • David Selzer
      January 3, 2025

      Thank you for the thoughtful comment, David. In both the title and the use of the word ‘reduced’ I was aiming for irony. Your scepticism suggests I’ve missed that target.

      • David Press
        January 3, 2025

        You missed it with me, but maybe not with others?

        I also read this poem alongside the others you published this month and that may have coloured my reading!