David Selzer is a writer of poetry, prose fiction, screenplays and stage plays. He embraces digital platforms to share his work of more than fifty years… READ MORE


  • ON THE NATURE OF BUTTERFLIES

    Before I even enter the room I hear

    the fluttering of tiny gossamer wings.

    A butterfly appears to be hoping

    that the window glass, at some point, will become

    empty air. I fetch a tumbler, and place it

    cautiously over the creature, which stills

    as I lift it away and cover the top

    with my palm. I can see now the butterfly

    is a Painted Lady – that ubiquitous

    migrant from North Africa – with its

    variegated wings of black, brown, ochre,

    olive and red, the subtlest of dazzles.

     

    As if it were a primed grenade or rare,

    exquisite crystal I carry the tumbler

    circumspectly to the balcony.

    The butterfly flies up, out, and not,

    as I would have anticipated, hoped,

    over jagged rocks and ragged seaweed

    towards the meticulous horizon

    across the bay – where a white hulled ketch

    is anchoring, its starboard light pale

    in the falling dusk – but back, over the roof,

    where, out of sight, beyond a dry stone wall,

    a wild bank rises of rosebay willowherb,

    convolvulus and bracken, effulgent

    beneath darkening sycamores and oaks.

     

     

     

     


    2 responses to “ON THE NATURE OF BUTTERFLIES”


    1. Ashen Avatar

      Made me pause. Where does freedom call? A poignant stretch between the clear horizon and the welcoming undergrowth..

    2. Clive Watkins Avatar
      Clive Watkins

      The first thing I want to say is that this is just delightful, David. Its apparent simplicity is beguiling. After a series of mostly straightforward sentences, the poem reaches its conclusion by way of several beautifully managed syntactical suspensions. First, “and not” sets up the long-to-be-delayed fulfilment which will come six lines later with the responding “but”. Next, “as I would have anticipated” is immediately modified by “hoped”. Then, my attention is detoured out in a panoramic sweep above rocks and seaweed towards the “meticulous horizon”. There the lovely description of the ketch absorbs more of my attention. (Is it fanciful to suggest that the ketch is a kind of butterfly, occupying, as it were, the place in the scene to which your initial hope might have consigned the Painted Lady? By the way, Painted Lady would make a good name for a ketch.) At last with “but” it seems the resolution has begun – only for it to be delayed yet again by “back, over the roof, / where, out of sight, beyond a dry stone wall” (whose imagined details parallel the view over the bay). Finally, with the “wild bank” it seems the pay-off is indeed at hand; but in fact the long sentence runs on further still as the various plants are listed before the whole poem concludes in an adjectival phrase of quiet crepuscular tenderness.

      I am struck by “meticulous”, the only word in these eleven closing lines (apart from “effulgent”) whose register gives it prominence against the relatively plain diction of the rest. Am I to sense its deep etymological roots in the Latin words metus (dread) and periculosus (dangerous)? Dangerous marine distances might well inspire dread in regard to your migrating butterfly.

      Last of all, I like the touch of magic in the echo I think I hear three lines from the end of a famous speech from A Midsummer Night’s Dream.

      One other thought… The poem opens with you imagining what you cannot see but deduce from the butterfly’s pattering sound. It ends with you imagining what you cannot see (but know is there) – the rosebay willowherb, convolvulus and bracken out of sight behind the house: an appealing symmetry.

      Masterly, David!

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search by Tag